Phillza Mirza: You’ve trained in both theatre and film. How does live performance inform the way you approach screen work? Do you find yourself craving that immediate connection with an audience?
Cole Doman: I was working on The Savant for eight months, and when it wrapped, I was asked to do an experimental off-Broadway play in New York. I was so excited because after being on a TV set, that return to the theatre felt electric again. People who do theatre definitely crave that instant connection; the cheers, the breath of the audience, their responses. But my goal has always been to do all three: theatre, film, and television. Each one feeds a different part of me. Theatre shaped the way I act; it taught me discipline, because you have less time. That immediacy lives in me even when I’m on set.
PM: You’ve been described as someone who brings both vulnerability and strength to your roles. Do you feel more connected to one side of yourself?
CD: I would say that the vulnerability came maybe a little bit easier to me. I was a very sensitive kid, and so I think I was able to tap into that earlier on. The fearlessness has come through, I think, as I’ve built trust with myself and released control about what the performance should be and relied on my directors and writers to say, okay, if you think I can do this, I’ll give it everything I have, I’ll throw it all out the window. And that’s been whenever I’ve been able to get myself there and do that, it’s the greatest payoff, not only for the final product, but also just becoming more skilled as an actor. In the end, I think that they coexist with each other because fearlessness really requires vulnerability to fail. And if anything, acting is about being totally comfortable with failure, you know?
PM: In Henry Gamble’s Birthday Party and Uncle Frank, you helped tell deeply queer stories. How has living openly shaped the roles you take and the way you approach them?
CD: When I started out, about 15 years ago, being out felt really valuable, almost urgent, because visibility was rare. There’s a reason I mostly started my career in theatre: I didn’t even think being in movies was possible for me. When it did happen, I wanted to be open about who I was. Now the industry is more inclusive, so my identity feels less like a precious thing I need to protect. I want to play any role I can, but if I’m doing a queer project, it has to say something new. So I think when these roles come to me, because they do and I’m so grateful, It’s a balancing act. I want to challenge myself as an actor and I’m always looking for the next big challenge. And if that is in a queer film with an amazing director who has something really specific to say, then I’m all on board. We’re such complex people. And of course being gay is a huge part of who I am, but it’s not the only part of who I am.
“When I started out, about 15 years ago, being out felt really valuable, almost urgent, because visibility was rare. There’s a reason I mostly started my career in theatre: I didn’t even think being in movies was possible for me.”
PM: Your new project The Mastermind has been described as a darkly compelling story about ambition, morality, and survival. What drew you to this project, and what can audiences expect from your role in it?
CD: The immediate draw for me was to work with Kelly Reichard, whose work I’ve been a massive fan of since I first saw Wendy & Lucy about 15 years ago. I’ve watched all of her films with great admiration. The script was humorous but also menacing, and I was excited about the chance to work alongside Josh O’Connor. My role is certainly different from what people may expect from me.
PM: How did working on The Mastermind differ from your past projects, either in terms of the character you play, the story’s themes, or the overall atmosphere on set?
CD: First, on a practical level, I worked with the great Liz Himelstein to be able to lock into the Worcester, MA dialect. Then once I got to set, Kelly creates an environment that is somehow both relaxed but also diligent. She’s been working with a lot of the same crew since the beginning of her career, so there’s a shorthand everyone has with each other. Once Kelly is happy with the take, we move on. I love a director who knows how to economize everyone’s time and energy – it takes confidence and skill to be able to do that. And she certainly has both of those things.
PM: So talking about your other new project that you’ve completed, congratulations, by the way. Let’s talk about The Savant. What drew you to it personally, its story, and your character in it?
CD: Honestly, when I saw Jessica Chastain was attached, I was a super fan already. Then I learned Melissa James Gibson, a playwright I admired in New York, was writing, and Matthew Heineman, who usually works in documentaries, was directing. I thought, what an interesting group of artists. The story itself felt layered, complex. My character, Steve, was nothing like me, to the point where my agent had to reassure me, “They know what you look like; don’t worry.” That challenge was exciting.
For me, Steve’s struggle with masculinity and belonging resonated. He wants a family, love, authority over his life, but he doesn’t have the tools. That kind of lack makes him vulnerable to indoctrination and hateful rhetoric. I don’t condone his choices, but I understood the outsider energy he carries. I’m not interested in playing someone who’s just hateful for the sake of it. I want to find humanity, even in the darkest corners.
PM: Without giving too much away, do you think audiences will see a new side of you in this performance?
CD: Absolutely. Five years ago, I don’t know if I would’ve believed I could play this role. But I’ve been building towards that kind of fearlessness we talked about earlier. I’m throwing it all at the wall. If it doesn’t land, fine. But I gave it everything. And I think people will be surprised.